The Journal explores constructive connections between science education and civic engagement that will enhance both experiences for our students. The Journal focuses on using unsolved, complex civic issues as a framework to develop students’ understanding of the role of scientific knowledge in personal and public decision making, along with examining how such knowledge is embedded in a broader social and political context. In addition to examining what students learn, we also investigate how this learning takes place and how it can be evaluated, documented, and strengthened. By exploring civic questions as unsolved challenges, we seek to empower students as engaged participants in their learning on campus and as citizens in their communities. Since many pressing issues are not constrained by national borders, we encourage perspectives that are international or global in scope.
Our community is rich with resources and faculty who effectively and successfully engage students in STEM courses using timely and relevant real-world problems. Our faculty are "natural treasures" who can advise on practical applications, interactive teaching strategies, and group projects that immerse and captivate a wide spectrum of students. Let us introduce you to some of these outstanding faculty through our webinars.
We offer live webinars that provide follow-up to SSI alumni, increase access to NCSCE resources, and provide useful, scholarly information using convenient electronic presentations. Recordings of our live webinars are sent out to our webinar registrants.
SSI Webinar Recordings
We have recorded and packaged some popular SENCER Summer Institute presentations as webinar recordings. These are available to watch and share by browsing the playlist below.
Recordings of Live Webinars
The SENCER models are curricular approaches to improving science learning and supporting engagement with complex issues. Through the "lens" of a matter or set of matters of public consequence, a SENCER model course or program teaches science that is both challenging and rigorous. SENCER models have clear learning outcomes. They seek transparency in their connection of classroom and related activities and the learning that is desired. Outcomes are assessed continuously. SENCER models reflect the intellectual curiosity of the faculty who developed them. At the same time, they respond to student interests, including personal interests, as well as public or civic ones.
- Field & Natural Science by Dr. Sarah Haines, Professor of Biological Sciences, Towson University
- Ecotoxicology ("Worm Lab") by Dr. Sharon Pochron, Sustainability Studies Program, Stony Brook University
Pearls of Practice: A new series of course modules and short activities
- Sources of Biological Energy by Dr. Linden Higgins, Education for Critical Thinking and Dr. Elizabeth Dolci, Johnson State College
- Answers That Lie in the Questions by Dr. Catherine Hurt Middlecamp, University of Wisconsin-Madison
- What's Radioactive in This Room? by Dr. Catherine Hurt Middlecamp, University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Do I Live in a Food Desert? by Dr. Autumn Marshall, Lipscomb University
- How Big is My Footprint? by Dr. Alison O'Malley, Butler University
- Cell as City by Dr. Gillian Backus, Northern Virginia Community College
- Meet the Beekeepers by Dr. Susan Cusato, Southern Connecticut State University
SENCER Backgrounders are intended to provide intelligent, general readers with high quality syntheses of some of the complex, capacious civic issues that SENCER courses sometimes use to teach basic science. The idea is not to explain the science, but to connect some of what is known, and as yet unknown scientifically, with some of what is at stake civically. A second goal is to identify where scientific knowledge sheds light in such a way as to make civic choices more optimal. Though science is only occasionally the final word on what choice one should make on a complex civic issue, it is worth knowing what science tells us as we deliberate and take into account matters that go beyond science.
Backgrounders cover topics such as synthetic biology, the Human Genome Project, human rights, HIV/AIDS, nanotechnology, and teaching.
NCSCE and KQED are partnering on a new pilot project, Do Now U. Do Now U engages undergraduate students in online discussions about current scientific issues through the innovative use of social media. Below are the latest Do Now U posts and KQED resources for creatively engaging your students in science and incorporating Twitter into the classroom.
- KQED Science - Award-winning science and environment coverage from the Bay Area and beyond, by the flagship Northern California PBS and NPR affiliate
- QUEST - Engaging, relevant science and engineering resources for educators, students, and lifelong learners
- KQED Teach - A fun and social online learning platform for educators to improve their media literacy skills
- Guide to Using Twitter in Your Teaching Practice - Resources for your school community to help jump into using social media, specifically Twitter, as a learning tool
- #TeachDoNow Online Course - Collaborative learning experience in partnership with the National Writing Project open to anyone interested in learning how to use Twitter and other media sharing applications to promote social and civic discourse with students
- Science Communication, Critical Thinking, and Social Media: Sparking Student Dialogue - Recording of webinar with Andrea Aust of KQED and two Do Now U faculty participants Jim Speer and Autumn Marshall that addresses the implementation of social media and simple media production as tools to engage students in civic discourse through KQED’s Do Now U project
Do Now U Posts
NCSCE and its initiatives publish resources that help educators connect the content they teach to issues of civic importance. We invite you to use and share our Model Courses, Backgrounders, teaching manuals, Journal articles, and meeting presentation slides, posters, and handouts. Resources can be filtered by type, discipline, and civic issue.